This public statement is issued by the HCV Network Secretariat in response to a formal complaint submitted by local organisations about a HCV screening conducted in Columbia in 2020.[1]
The concerns included, amongst others, that:
- The report omitted information on social HCVs that had been provided by the local communities;
- There was insufficient engagement with local people during the screening process; and
- The draft report might be used to make land- and water-use planning decisions in the future.
Further to an investigation into the complaint, HCV Network updated and republished the HCV Screening Briefing Note to clarify what screening can - and cannot - be used for.
Key points from the HCV Landscape Screening Guidance include the following:
- In general, HCV screening is high-level, large-scale, and conducted through desktop work – combined with some consultation.
- HCV screening must not be used as a shortcut to bypass local-level field work, consultation and Free Prior and Informed Consent that are collectively required for a full land-use planning process or a site-level HCV or HCV-HCSA assessment.
- Full local (community-level) consultation is not usually possible during a landscape-level HCV screening exercise because of the time it takes.
- Therefore, the results of HCV Screening are insufficient and inappropriate as a basis for finalising land use plans or issuing specific recommendations on HCV management and monitoring for all six HCV categories.[2]
In addition, HCV Screening cannot be used to demonstrate that no loss of HCVs has taken place.
Further documentation on the complaint can be found on the HCV Network website here.
The HCV Network regularly updates its guidance. We welcome further input from our members and other users to improve and expand our resources to support the long-term protection of all HCVs.
Formore information contact the Secretariat