Laporan Integrasi Penilaian Nilai Konservasi Tinggi dan Stok Karbon Tinggi PT Agrolestari Sentosa, Kabupaten Gunung Mas, Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah. Indonesia

Assessor:

Cecep Saepulloh

Formerly Licensed Assessor:

Cecep Saepulloh

Organization Commissioning Assessment:

PT Agrolestari Sentosa

Type:

Integrated HCV-HCSA Assessment

Country:

Indonesia

Purpose:

RSPO New Planting

Notes on the Report:

This report required several revisions to be satisfactory. In line with the ALS Evaluation Procedure, since resubmissions pay a lower fee the Quality Panel focuses their effort on the sections marked unsatisfactory. Any unrequested changes to "satisfactory" sections are the responsibility of the assessor, as the Quality Panel is not expected to revise sections marked satisfactory

Stage
Click on each stage to display more information.
Date of Submission:

December 29, 2020

QP Feedback:

Unsatisfactory

Date of QP Feedback:

March 8, 2021

Feedback Accepted:

Date of Appeal:

Appeal Result:

Date of Appeal Result:

Size of Development Area (in ha):

23880

Deadline for Resubmission:

April 8, 2021

Date Resubmitted:

May 4, 2021

QP Feedback:

Unsatisfactory

Date of QP Feedback:

June 28, 2021

Response to QP Feedback:

Date of Appeal:

Date of Appeal Result:

Appeal Result:

Deadline for Resubmission:

July 28, 2021

Date Resubmitted:

May 11, 2022

QP Feedback:

Satisfactory

Date of QP Feedback:

May 11, 2022

Response to QP Feedback:

Date of Appeal:

March 9, 2022

Date of Appeal Result:

Appeal Result:

Size of Development Area (in ha):

23879

Total Conservation Area (in ha):

7008

HCVs and Area Identified by HCV:

Pale colours represent HCV areas in the original version of the report.  Bright colours represent HCV areas in the satisfactory report (after quality assurance).

Date of Submission:

December 29, 2020

QP Feedback:

Unsatisfactory

Date of QP Feedback:

March 8, 2021

Feedback Accepted:

Date of Appeal:

Appeal Result:

Date of Appeal Result:

Size of Development Area (in ha):

23880

Deadline for Resubmission:

April 8, 2021

Date Resubmitted:

May 4, 2021

QP Feedback:

Unsatisfactory

Date of QP Feedback:

June 28, 2021

Response to QP Feedback:

Date of Appeal:

Date of Appeal Result:

Appeal Result:

Deadline for Resubmission:

July 28, 2021

Date Resubmitted:

May 11, 2022

QP Feedback:

Satisfactory

Date of QP Feedback:

May 11, 2022

Response to QP Feedback:

Date of Appeal:

March 9, 2022

Date of Appeal Result:

Appeal Result:

Size of Development Area (in ha):

23879

Total Conservation Area (in ha):

7008

HCVs and Area Identified by HCV:

Pale colours represent HCV areas in the original version of the report.  Bright colours represent HCV areas in the satisfactory report (after quality assurance).

Date of Submission:

December 29, 2020

QP Feedback:

Unsatisfactory

Date of QP Feedback:

March 8, 2021

Feedback Accepted:

Date of Appeal:

Appeal Result:

Date of Appeal Result:

Size of Development Area (in ha):

23880

Total Conservation Area (in ha):

7008

Deadline for Resubmission:

April 8, 2021

Date Resubmitted:

May 4, 2021

QP Feedback:

Unsatisfactory

Date of QP Feedback:

June 28, 2021

Response to QP Feedback:

Date of Appeal:

Date of Appeal Result:

Appeal Result:

Deadline for Resubmission:

July 28, 2021

Date Resubmitted:

May 11, 2022

QP Feedback:

Unsatisfactory

Date of QP Feedback:

May 11, 2022

Response to QP Feedback:

Date of Appeal:

March 9, 2022

Date of Appeal Result:

Appeal Result:

Size of Development Area (in ha):

23879

Total Conservation Area (in ha):

7008

HCVs and Area Identified by HCV:

Pale colours represent HCV areas in the original version of the report.  Bright colours represent HCV areas in the satisfactory report (after quality assurance).

Status

Closed

?
?
?
?
?

Satisfactory

?

Our Partnerships

Get Involved

The Network is always looking for partners who are interested in supporting our work, for talented professionals who can join the growing Secretariat team, and for professionals who can lead assessments globally.

Get Involved